Editorial
Vitamin D and Hip Fractures: Indian Scenario
TR Bandgar1, NS Shah2
1Associate Professor, 2Professor and Head, Department of
Endocrinology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Parel,
Mumbai - 400 012.
In this issue of JAPI, Khadgawat et al have documented vitamin
D deficiency (VDD) in patients with fragility fractures of the
hip and their follow up for 1 year.
Various important issues pertaining to Asian Indians are put
forth, viz younger age at onset of fracture (mean: 62.2 years),
prevalent VDD (mean: 9.9ng/ml; 96.7%), with inadequate sun
exposure (in 34.8%patients) and calcium and Vit. D supplements
(in 11.62%). Follow up for 1year was available in 60.46% of
whom 42.3% died in one year underscoring the importance of
preventing hip fractures.
Hip fractures are a major health problem in a developing
country like India. They cause profound physical impairment,
reduction in quality of life, admission to institutional care and
also mortality especially in the elderly. The Indian population
appears particularly vulnerable to the problem of osteoporosis
and hip fractures.1 Risk factors for osteoporosis that have been
described include female sex, low body mass index, old age,
positive family history, early menopause or amenorrhoea,
smoking, sedentary lifestyle, poor calcium intake and VDD.2,3.
It has been shown that hip fractures occur a decade earlier
in Indians in comparison with western Caucasian counterparts.1
The life expectancy at birth in 2003 was 61.8 years for Indian
males and 63.5 years for Indian females4 and as it shows an
upward trend, increasing proportion of our population would
face these problems.
When the amount of calcium available from the diet is
insufficient, such as in VDD, calcium is withdrawn from bone,
mainly from cortical bone which decreases bone strength
and contributes to the pathogenesis of osteoporosis and
predisposes a patient to fragility fractures. Although secondary
hyperparathyroidism, muscle weakness, and osteomalacia
are generally more notable in cases of VDD, these conditions
can be associated with vitamin D insufficiency also. India is
located between 8.4 and 37.61N latitude with the majority of its
population living in regions with ample sunlight throughout
the year Nonetheless, there are numerous reports of widespread
VDD(<20ng/ml)/insufficiency(20-30ng/ml) in India, which
include various socioeconomic groups, ages, both genders and
different ethnicities, rural and urban areas as well as different profession.5
Most of the studies showed circulating 25 hydroxy vitamin
D3 [25(OH) D] levels well below 50 nmol/L (20ng/ml). Many
studies showed that rural populations, esp. males (children and
older adults), had slightly higher 25(OH)D levels presumably
due to higher sun exposure.5 Dietary vitamin D was measured in
only two of the studies, and it was extremely low in both upper
and lower socioeconomic groups and in urban as well as rural
populations.6,7 Some of these studies have reported biochemical
osteomalacia characterized by increased parathyroid hormone,
reduced bone mineral density of the spine, femur and forearm
and bone deformities.8 Postmenopausal women residing in
Southern India showed varying degrees of vitamin D status.5
These ranged from severely deficient to just adequate with 52%
of the population showing a mean level of 37.5 nmol/L (15ng/
ml), a conservative cut-off level for VDD. None of these women
had serum 25(OH) D concentrations in the optimal range. Strong
association between body exposure to sun and 25(OH) D levels
in India have been documented very recently. For example, Sahu
et al. have shown greater sun exposure among boys especially
in summer months resulting in higher serum 25(OH) D levels.9
Goswami et al. have shown much higher serum 25(OH)D in
soldiers with longer sun exposure than in physicians, nurses,
and pregnant women.10 Similar observation was noted by Zargar
et al. among farmers compared with government employees,
people who spend most of the time inside their homes/offices,
medical professionals and students.11 This calls for educating
people about the relationship between safe sun exposure and optimal vitamin D levels. Even this might not be sufficient as
evidenced by the fact that more than 70% of the farmers had
VDD [<50 nmol/L; (20ng/ml)], with an average sun exposure of
25.1 h/wk.11 VDD may also be due to darker skin pigmentation
in most Indians, which is known to be an effective sunscreen
blocking vitamin D synthesis. Skin types classified according to
the level of melanin, the sun blocking pigment, require different
durations of sun exposure to synthesize the same amount of
vitamin D. The majority of Indians range in skin type from IV
to V and may require from two to three times longer exposure
duration than lighter skinned Europeans (types I, II and III) to
synthesize the same level of vitamin D.12 This may be hampered
by the traditional dress code in India. Goswami et al.10 showed
that people without pigmentation had lower serum 25(OH)
D levels in winter months and attributed this to the clothing
covering most of their body surface (90%), thus limiting the sun
exposure. Social and religious customs that require people to
wear concealing clothing, veiling and traditional attire, such as
the ‘‘Burqa’’, ‘‘salvar kameez’’ and sari significantly prevents sun
exposure.11,12,13 The role of increasing pollution in the metropolis
cannot be overemphasized which blocks the ultraviolet B rays.12
Puri et al.6 have shown that school girls from lower
socioeconomic strata in Delhi had slightly better serum 25(OH)
D than those from upper socioeconomic strata, because 28% of
their body surface was exposed to sun for about 45 min/day,
compared with 15% body surface exposed to 25 min/day in the
higher socioeconomic group. Awumey et al. also reported altered
vitamin D metabolism in cultured skin fibroblasts from Indians14.
In the latest review5 the following preventive measures were
suggested to combat VDD and its ill effects; namely sunlight
exposure at least 30 minutes/day, good dietary calcium and Vit
D intake, food fortification with Vit D, avoid use of sun screens
with SPF greater than 6 and promoting outdoor activities of the
elderly and aged.
Vitamin D Deficiency and
Risk of Hip Fractures
Over 90% of fractures occur after a fall and fall rates increase
with age and poor muscle strength or function. Thus, a benefit of
vitamin D on both fall and fracture prevention is of significant
clinical importance. In humans, several lines of evidence support
a role of vitamin D in muscle health. First, proximal muscle
weakness is a prominent feature of the clinical syndrome of
VDD.15 VDD myopathy includes proximal muscle weakness,
diffuse muscle pain, and waddling gait. Second, vitamin D
receptor (VDR) is expressed in human muscle tissue and its
activation may promote de novo protein synthesis in muscle.
Finally, suggesting a role of vitamin D in muscle development,
mice lacking the VDR show a skeletal muscle phenotype with
smaller and variable muscle fibers.16 Recent meta-analysis17 on
fall prevention included 8 double blind RCTs with predefined
fall assessment throughout the trial period (n = 2426) and
found significant heterogeneity by dose (low-dose: < 700 IU
per day versus higher dose: 700– 1000 IU per day; p-value 0.02)
and achieved 25(OH)D level (< 60 nmol/l [24ng/ml] versus ≥ 60
nmol/l[24ng/ml]; p-value = 0.005) [12]. Higher dose supplemental
vitamin D reduced fall risk by 19 % (pooled relative risk [RR] =
0.81; 95%-CI: 0.71–0.92; n = 1921 from seven trials) versus a lower
dose which did not (pooled RR = 1.10, 95%-CI: 0.89–1.35 from
2 trials) and also achieved serum 25(OH)D concentrations < 60
nmol/l[24ng/ml] did not reduce the risk of falling (pooled RR =
1.35, 95%-CI: 0.98–1.84). Notably, at the higher dose of 700–1000
IU vitamin D, this meta-analysis documented a 38 % reduction in
the risk of falling with treatment duration of 2 to 5 months and a
sustained significant effect of 17 % fall reduction with treatment
duration of 12–36 months, and the benefit was independent of
type of dwelling and age. Thus, benefits of 700–1000 IU vitamin
D per day on fall prevention are rapid and sustained and include
all subgroups of the senior population.
A programme of muscle strengthening and balance training,
individually prescribed by a trained health professional in
primary health care setting, reduces the frequency of falls in
high risk community-dwelling older people. Assessment, advice,
and facilitation of home environment modification, reduces
the frequency of falls in high risk community-dwelling older
people18 which is important as majority of the fall occurred at
home especially in the bathroom, in the present study.
Recent meta-analysis19 on fracture prevention included 12
double-blind RCTs for non-vertebral fractures (n = 42,279) and
8 RCTs for hip fractures (n = 40,886), and, similar to the metaanalysis
on fall prevention, it found significant heterogeneity for
received dose of vitamin D and achieved level of 25(OH)D in
the treatment group for hip and any non-vertebral fractures. No
fracture reduction was observed for a received dose of 400 IU or
less per day or achieved 25(OH) D levels of less than 75 nmol/l
[30ng/ml]. Conversely, a higher received dose of 482–770 IU
supplemental vitamin D per day reduced non-vertebral fractures
by 20% (pooled RR = 0.80; 95%-CI: 0.72–0.89; n = 33,265 from
9 trials) and hip fractures by 18 % (pooled RR = 0.82; 95%- CI:
0.69–0.97; n = 31,872 from 5 trials). Notably, subgroup analyses
for the prevention of non-vertebral fractures with the higher
received dose suggested a benefit in all subgroups of the older
population, and possibly better fracture reduction with D3
(cholecalciferol) compared to D2 (ergocalciferol).
In developing countries calcium intakes are low (average of
344 mg), as compared to developed countries (average of 850
mg).20 The high phytate concentration present in commonly
consumed Indian foods such as chapattis and legumes might be
expected to increase the calcium requirement. Calcium balance
studies in subjects living in such conditions are not yet available.21
There is increasing debate over whether Vit D alone or
calcium and Vit D in combination are needed to prevent hip
fractures due to the available conflicting findings in the literature
with metaanalysis involving randomized control trial, open label
trial, various doses of Vit D used, the treatment adherence and
compliance to medications.21,22
To optimize clinical efficacy especially in the Asian Indian
setting, oral vitamin D 700–1000 IU/d should be complemented
with calcium, using a dose of 1000–1200 mg/d of elemental
calcium. Alternatively giving a oral bolus dose of Vit D
(ergocalciferol) 600,000 IU in divided dosages over 4-5 weeks
to normalize serum 25(OH) D level followed by 60,000IU
once a month to maintain that level could be another option.
Fortification of food (wheat flour/ Milk) could be an important
step to correct VDD in community. Wheat flour is the major
component of chapattis consumed by all ages, socioeconomic
backgrounds and by the rural and urban populations. Others
have shown the stability of vitamin D fortification of grain
products to long shelf life, stability to high baking temperatures
and excellent bioavailability and it being cost effective.12,23,24
Because of its frequency, its ease of detection, its associated
adverse outcomes, and the straightforward, inexpensive and
effective means by which it can be treated, VDD/ insufficiency
should be sought especially when evaluating and treating
osteoporotic, subjects. Finally, it should be remembered that
treatment of VDD/ insufficiency has two phases: 1) restoration
of 25OHD levels to more than 30 ng/ml (at least>20ng/ml); and
2) maintenance of the serum 25OHD in that range. The serum
25OHD is monitored annually to ensure sufficiency.
To summarise, VDD is rampant throughout India. Prevention
of bone fractures requires modification of multitude of risk
factors one of which is Vitamin D. Also, one cannot expect
a single vitamin D concentration to be directly related to an
outcome when that specific outcome (i.e., fracture risk) is the
result of a lifetime exposure of risks and behaviours, only one of
which is vitamin D. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of all
of these issues when they request and interpret a vitamin D level.
References
- Malhotra N, Mithal A: Osteoporosis in Indians. Indian J Med Res
2008;127:263-8.
- Ruchira M Jha, Ambrish Mithal, Nidhi Malhotra and Edward
M Brown Pilot case-control investigation of risk factors for hip
fractures in the urban Indian population. BMC Musculoskeletal
Disorders 2010;11:49
- Cummings SR, Melton LJ: Epidemiology and outcomes of
osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 2002;359:1761-7.
- Registrar General, India, SRS Based Abridged Life Tables. 1999-2003.
Statement 2 2006
- Harinarayan CV, Joshi SR, Vitamin D status in India – its
implications and remedial measures. J Assoc Physicians India
2009;57:40–8.
- Puri S, Marwaha RK, Agarwal N, Tandon N. et al. Vitamin D status
of apparently healthy schoolgirls from two different socioeconomic
strata in Delhi: relation to nutrition and lifestyle. Br J Nutr 2008;99:
876–82.
- Sachan A, Gupta R, Das V, Agarwal A et al. High prevalence of
vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women and their newborns
in northern India. Am J Clin Nutr 2005;81:1060–4 .
- Arya V, Bhambri R, Godbole MM, Mithal A,Vitamin D status and
its relationship with bone mineral density in healthy Asian Indians.
Osteoporos Int 2004;15:56–61.
- Sahu M, Bhatia V, Aggarwal A, Rawat V et al. Vitamin D deficiency
in rural girls and pregnant women despite abundant sunshine in
northern India. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2008;70:680–4.
- Goswami R, Gupta N, Goswami D, Marwaha RK et al. Prevalence
and significance of low 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations in
healthy subjects in Delhi. Am J Clin Nutr 2000;72:472–5.
- Zargar AH, Ahmad S, Masoodi SR, Wani AI et al. Vitamin D status in
apparently healthy adults in Kashmir Valley of Indian subcontinent.
Postgrad Med J 2007;83:713–6.
- Uma S Babu, Mona S Calvo. Modern India and the vitamin D
dilemma: Evidence for the need of a national food fortification
program. Mol Nutr Food Res 2010;54:1–14.
- Masood SH, IM. Prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in South Asia.
Pak J Med Sci 2008;24:891–7.
- Awumey EM, Mitra DA, Hollis BW, et al.: Vitamin D metabolism
is altered in Asian Indians in the southern United States: a clinical
research center study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:169-73.
- Glerup H, Mikkelsen K, Poulsen L, et al. Hypovitaminosis D
myopathy without biochemical signs of osteomalacic bone
involvement. Calcif Tissue Int 2000;66:419–24.
- Bischoff-Ferrari. Contribution of vitamin D to fracture prevention
HJ Miner Stoffwechs 2010;17:34–8.
- Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Dawson-Hughes B, Staehelin HB, et al. Fall
prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a
meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2009;339:b3692.
- Gillespie LD, Gillespie WJ, Robertson MC, Lamb SE, Cumming
RG, Rowe BH. Interventions for preventing falls in elderly people
(Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2001. Oxford:
Update Software
- Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Willett WC, Wong JB, et al. Prevention of
nonvertebral fractures with oral vitamin D and dose dependency:
a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med
2009;169:551–61.
- V Bhatia. Dietary calcium intake - a critical reappraisal. Indian J
Med Res 2008;127:269-73.
- Nordin BEC. Calcium requirement is a sliding scale. Am J Clin Nutr
2000;71:1381-3.
- H Handoll. Update of a systematic review of vitamin D for
preventing osteoporotic fractures. Inj Prev 2009;15:213.
- Steven Boonen, Paul Lips, Roger Bouillon, Heike A Bischoff-Ferrari,
Dirk Vanderschueren, and Patrick Haentjens. Need for Additional
Calcium to Reduce the Risk of Hip Fracture with Vitamin D
Supplementation: Evidence from a Comparative Metaanalysis of
Randomized Controlled Trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:1415–
23.
- Natri AM, Salo P, Vikstedt T, Palssa A et al. Bread fortified
with cholecalciferol increases the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin
D concentration in women as effectively as a cholecalciferol
supplement. J Nutr 2006;136:123–7.
|